About This Blog

Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) was the greatest economist of my time. His greatest works can be accessed here at no charge.

Mises believed that property, freedom and peace are and should be the hallmarks of a satisfying and prosperous society. I agree. Mises proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the prospect for general and individual prosperity is maximized, indeed, is only possible, if the principle of private property reigns supreme. What's yours is yours. What's mine is mine. When the line between yours and mine is smudged, the door to conflict opens. Without freedom (individual liberty of action) the principle of private property is neutered and the free market, which is the child of property and freedom and the mother of prosperity and satisfaction, cannot exist. Peace is the goal of a prosperous and satisfying society of free individuals, not peace which is purchased by submission to the enemies of property and freedom, but peace which results from the unyielding defense of these principles against all who challenge them.

In this blog I measure American society against the metrics of property, freedom and peace.

Friday, February 5, 2021

IF THIS VIDEO DOES NOT MAKE YOUR BLOOD BOIL, YOU ARE EITHER UN-AMERICAN OR BRAIN-DEAD!


Link to video: Absolute Proof

When I vote in person and when my ballot is sucked into the election computer for tabulation, I assume that ALL the voting machine is doing is reading my ballot and automatically adding it to the tally of votes from my fellow citizens. In other words, I assume the machine which eats my vote is no more and no less than an automated adding machine with the simple ability to read my ballot and do basic arithmetic, i.e., to ADD. 

Now, as a direct result of watching the attached video from Mike Lindell, I learn that the machine that sucks up my vote is not merely a glorified adding machine, but might be a sophisticated computer which has the ability to question my vote, “weight” my vote and change my vote under certain circumstances. Not only that, but this machine might be or can be connected to the internet which subjects it and my vote to all manner of security breaches and hacking by anyone with know-how and access to the internet.

 I don’t know about you, but as a voting American I find this outrageous! If my vote can be overridden by a computer voting machine, or by a person who supervises the operation of that computer, or a person who has access to that computer via the internet, I ask a simple question: Why bother to ever vote in the future if this situation does not change?

 The linked video evokes the following questions:

 1.       How can any American who watches this video doubt – in good conscience – that massive voter fraud MIGHT have corrupted the 2020 election?

2.       How can any American who watches this video have confidence that his vote will count in future elections if the current system does not change?

3.      Media apologists who claim the election was totally honest and that fraud did not occur have claimed that voting machines in swing states were NOT able to be connected to the internet. This is an easy issue to resolve. A simple examination of the machines would suffice. In the video a technician alleges that the voting machine instruction manual gives step by step directions on how to connect the machines to the internet. This is an easy allegation to verify. Surely you agree.

4.       How can any American who watches this video NOT insist that the allegations in this video – in the very least – ought to be investigated by the DOJ?

5.       How can any American journalist who calls himself a professional not be motivated to investigate these allegations?

6.       Why is any discussion of this systematic voter fraud forbidden by American public discourse companies such as Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and the like?

7.       When a process goes from simple and easy to understand (hand-counting of ballots) to something complex and virtually incomprehensible (computer-processed voting), the potential for fraud undetected by the public increases exponentially. Which begs the question: Why do we need sophisticated computers, possibly connected to the internet, to tabulate votes in American elections? Canada counts votes by hand. And in America, if a judge orders a hand recount of ballots, that recount can be accomplished in the space of 24 to 48 hours. So, give me one solid reason why election votes in America shouldn’t be counted by hand from this time forward?

No comments: